
NEW YORK, NY – MAY 03: Republican presidential front runner Donald Trump speaks to supporters and the media at Trump Tower in Manhattan following his victory in the Indiana primary on May 03, 2016 in New York City. Trump beat rival Ted Cruz decisively in a contest that many analysts believe was the last chance for any other Republican candidate to catch Trump in the delegate count. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Oh, yuck. Everything the pundits predicted couldn’t happen, happened in Indiana on the evening of May 3, when Trump, the dude with the orange hair, swept the state and became the Republican nominee.
While Rob and I were watching this, he remarked that the young man standing behind Trump in the pink tie in that Huffington Post photo (click link above), the young guy whose face is white, looked like a vampire. “Actually,” he added, “they all look like vampires.” The son with an unhealthy pallor, the plastic wife, the plastic blonde daughters, the son-in-law who supposedly likes politics, as Trump said, better than he likes selling real estate.
Great. A family of vampires in the White House. That will certainly be the walking dead.Yet, that analogy fits Trump and his clan.
A candidate who has yet to say much of anything other than his slogan that he’ll make America great again might well occupy the White House with his vampire kin. His wife – the third – will have the dubious distinction of having posed nude for a magazine. And oh, by the way, the Clintons were at his wedding to that third wife.
Bernie Sanders also won Indiana tonight and that gives him a momentum to stay in the race through the California primary on June 7. But the pundits also got his candidacy all wrong. They expected the Democratic selection process to be wrapped up by now and still refer to Clinton, who represents politics as usual, as the presumptive nominee.
Why is it that two outliers – Trump and Sanders – have galvanized the electorate?
Why is it that the two candidates with the most unfavorable ratings in many polls – Trump and Clinton – are what the two parties are offering? As Chuck Todd noted on MSNBC, this is the first time something like this has happened.
But then, this election season has been completely unpredictable, with all the usual rules out the window. Sanders rightly argues that the super delegates rule in the Democratic party is not democracy; it’s the party selecting the candidate. He also points out some weird stuff going on with the Clinton fund raising machine- an investigation conducted by Politico that found some irregularities about where the funds actually go (hint: into Clinton’s coffers with less than one percent of $60 million going to Dem candidates in other states).
The sad and pathetic part of all this is that pundits believe that if Clinton is the nominee, Bernie’s supporters will hold their noses and vote collectively for her just to ensure that Trump doesn’t win. At one time, I was in that camp. But if she and Trump are it, I will hold my nose and choose not to vote at all on election day.
In the larger picture, this election isn’t just about who becomes the next president. It’s about our evolution as a country, a species. Clinton represents the old guard. Sanders represents the new guard. And Trump represents the really old guard from the mid-20th century, where women and minorities were second class citizens without any rights at all.



























