Did a Town in China Disappear?

On October 13, the same date as the daytime sightings in Manhattan, a UFO was supposedly reported over the  Qinling Mountains in China. Then a short video surfaced. Then a denial by the China government. The government said it was a rumor that got started by a blogger, a hoax. One site noted there’s a nuclear facility in the area and speculated that perhaps the facility had melted down. No telling what actually happened. But here’s a video and some links aft the video. Note that on the video, a date is wrong – June 10, but this happened Oct 13.Not sure what to make of this, except that it’s a good case for Scully and Muldur!

The other links are here and here.

This entry was posted in china, UFOs. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Did a Town in China Disappear?

  1. Anonymous says:

    In 1047BC, a town called "Pyramis", located not far from the neighboring city of Tannis, both in Egypt and on the Nile River, disappeared from the face of the planet. Poof. Gone. Pyramis wasn't a small town, and had temples and homes, etc. It wasn't until centuries later, in 1976, that a team of archeologists actually found the town, which was/is located deep beneath the sands and in an area where the Nile has sometimes risen and fallen. This has been a mystery for all these centuries, and it still isn't understood exactly how Pyramis vanished. The village in China that allegedly vanished was/is located in a deep valley between mountain ranges. It could have had the same fate as the Egyptian town of Pyramis. Pyramis is not a legend. It's an archelogical fact. And, both Pyramis and the village in China were located very near pyramid structures. Coincidence? Hhhhmmmm. Again, stranger than fiction. Curious WV: "fatie" cj

  2. GYPSYWOMAN says:

    an incredible story, for sure – and one i'd not heard until your post – and nancy, i'd also not heard the JP story either, so i greatly appreciate both – extraordinary happenings –

    wv – diessuf

  3. Anonymous says:

    Trish and Rob, if you google China Pyramids, you'll find several good articles as well as good photos of the pyramids that the Chinese gov't for a long time tried to deny were there, before the evidence surfaced from many sources showing that they indeed are there, and the Chinese gov't had no choice but to back-pedal. I suspect they will do the same with this disappearing town business. There has been more than one entire culture suddenly vanish from the face of the planet, leaving no explanation for the disappearance. Truth is stanger than fiction, often. Cute WV: "nintlkin" cj

  4. Anonymous says:

    cj – and I mean this with all due respect and with absolutely no intent to offend you, but as a serious question…

    HUH???

  5. Anonymous says:

    A footnote: I have researched every available source for the definition of Ockham's Razor and have found them ALL to be in agreement that the hypothesis is not aligned with the scientific method,(the theory having been established incorrectly in the mid-1300s by a religious zealot and proven repeatedly to be incorrect prior to and during this current century). Therefore out of respect and consideration for the friends on this blog, and its owners, I consider the issue of Ockham's Razor to be a closed issue, not open for debate, and will not be dragged into same under any circumstances. cj

  6. Anonymous says:

    Ahem.Listen up, guys. Definition from Encyclopeadia Brittanica and Wikipedia, the online free encyclopedia: "Occam's razor, (or Ockham's razor), is the law of persimony, law of economy, or law of succinctness. The principle is popularly, BUT INCORRECTLY, summarized as "the simplest explanation is usually the correct one". Ockham's razor is attributed to the 14th-century (whew, that old and out-dated?) English logician and Franciscan friar Father Willam of Ockham. "In science, Ockham's razor is used as a heuristic (rule of thumb) to guide scientists in the development of theoretical models rather than as an arbiter between published models. In the scientific method, 'OCKHAM'S RAZOR IS NOT (NOT!!!!!!!) CONSIDERED AN IRREFUTABLE PRINCIPLE OF LOGIC, AND CERTAINLY NOT (NOT!!!!!!!) A SCIENTIFIC RESULT. (Repeat) NOT!!!!! A SCIENTIFIC RESULT. In 2005 Marcus Hutter mathematically PROVED that shorter computable theories have more weight when calculating the expected value of an action ACROSS ALL COMPUTABLE THEORIES WHICH PERFECTLY DESCRIBE PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS". Page 1 of 1Occam's Razor
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/occams
    razor Of course, the encyclopedias MUST be wrong! cj

  7. Nancy says:

    We also live on a fault line with small quakes in the area that lasted for months two years ago. Nerves were definitely stretched, with my sister's home right in the middle of them. Now homes are not selling in that area because of these events. Being prepared for an emergency is not mass hysteria. It's something our government and the CDC has been telling us to do since Katrina. You cannot depend on someone else to take care of you in the event of an emergency, especially not your government – think Indonesia after the tsunami, Pakistan after the floods, Haiti after the earthquake, need I go on?

  8. Trish and Rob MacGregor says:

    Occam's Razor: Immediately accept the denial of the Chinese gov't over an eyewitness, if the eyewitness's account is outside the box of your belief system. Check the facts later.

  9. Anonymous says:

    The old adage "where there's smoke, there's fire", generally turns out to have at least a grain of truth in it. I repeat, (constantly), that this world and every country in it, large or small, is run by powers behind the powers, by powers that operate under the radar. They deny deny deny. There will be a day of reckoning at some point, and that day is rapidly approaching, from all the increasing evidence. I agree….show us the Chinese town as of 11-2-2010. For decades the Chinese gov't denied the existence of any pyramids in their country, and lo and behold, photographers and pilots from all over the globe have taken up-close, valid photographs of more than 100 pyramids in that country, which the Chinese gov't initially loudly proclimed didn't exist, then changed its story to say the pyramids DO exist and are are "burial grounds". So much for the truth of the Chinese government. cj

  10. Trish and Rob MacGregor says:

    The Chinese gov't says it's just a rumor. But that's not proof. Let's see the town today with verifiably dated pics and video. That's evidence. Just accepting what authorities say is not. So let's see the 11/2/1010 video of the town.

  11. Anonymous says:

    I don't hear or see any signs of mass hysteria anywhere. Just interest, which is always a good thing. Scientists and meteorologists are predicting a horrifically frigid winter here in the U.S., which always means power outages and folks stuck indoors due to blizzards, impassable roads, etc etc etc. Just as we prepare for hurricane season, it's a reasonable plan to have supplies on hand in the event of such events. Never a silly idea to be prepared for the unexpected in life. cj

  12. Anonymous says:

    Here's the original article from People's Daily, for those who don't wish to click through from the first site:

    https://english.people.com.cn/90001/90782/90872/7169274.html

  13. Anonymous says:

    https://technorati.com/technology/article/qinling-ufo-rumor-false-says-peoples/

    Amazing how rumors grow into mass hysteria, isn't it?

    Your friend,
    PAUL

  14. Nancy says:

    Some very weird happenings. Very weird. I feel like something is going to happen very soon –

    Spent all day in emergency preparedness. It's time to make sure you have basic necessities met, just in case. I heard today on a website that Janet Napalatono is quietly telling friends to have 4-6 months in food and water. It may just be in case of natural disaster, but I think I may take her advice.

  15. Trish and Rob MacGregor says:

    Plenty weird, for sure. I thought Google earth might provide some insight, but nope. We do have a friend who reads mandarin chinese. I'll send the chinese link to him and see what he makes of it.

  16. Jen says:

    ACKK!! This is… wow.

  17. Natalie says:

    Yes! 🙂
    This post went away from me for a while, but is back again. WEIRD.

  18. Trish and Rob MacGregor says:

    Interesting WV, Natalie!

  19. Natalie says:

    I don't like it, I don't like it.
    It reeks.

    wv = exaci

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *