
Imagine it. A Friday morning, the Christmas holidays just days away. Your elementary school child has just finished breakfast, has her backpack ready to go, homework inside. You drive her to the school near your home and she gives you a quick hug and hops out of the car, eager to join her classmates. You have no idea you will never see her alive again.
The parents and families of 20 young children are now struggling to come to terms with the fact that their children are dead, victims of the second deadliest school shooting in the history of the U.S. Only the mass shootings at Virginia Tech in 2007 were deadlier – 32 died.
But there is something particularly horrifying about this mass shooting – at an elementary school in Connecticut, where the 626 students range in age from 5-10, Kindergarten through fourth grade. Kids. Little kids.
The shooter, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, allegedly shot his mother first, at her home, then drove her car to Sandy Hook Elementary, where she taught Kindergarten or first grade, we’ve heard reports that cite both. At 9:40 AM Lanza allegedly entered the school wearing a mask and black clothing. He first killed the principal and the school psychologist execution style, then went into the class where his mother taught.
He was armed with three weapons – A Glock, a Sig Sauer, and a Bushmaster .223 – an assault rifle, a combat weapon that allows the shooter to fire up to six bullets a second. According to some reports, he fired at least 100 rounds, mowing down 20 young kids.
How many more horrors is it going to take before lawmakers in this country change the gun laws? How many more Gabby Giffords, Columbines, Virginia Techs, Sikh Temples, Oregon malls and Aurora Colorados is it going to take before lawmakers wake up to the fact that the second amendment was written in 1791 and that world no longer exists? How many more tragedies will it take to break the hold the National Rifle Association has on lawmakers?
Assault weapons aren’t used for hunting. They’re used in combat zones, in war, to kill people. Why should any ordinary citizen have the right to purchase one of these things?
As with so many stories that reach a tipping point in the media, global stories, there’s a strange synchronicity with this one: the guns were registered and bought legally by Nancy Lanza, the shooter’s mother. A dark trickster synchro, this one. And dark trickster synchros sometimes reveal, over time, other elements that played into the tragedy.
When I first heard the news that Nancy Lanza had purchased these weapons, my initial reaction was simple: Why would any parent buy an assault weapon? What was really going on here?
We may never know the full truth. We may never know why a twenty-year-old man killed his mother, then drove her car to the school where she taught and killed 20 of her young students. Psychologist are already having a field day with this one. A psychologist interviewed on MSNBC gave what sounded like a Freudian explanation. Adam killed the person he loved (mom) then killed the youngsters whom she loved. Somehow, that explanation sounds too simplistic.
I think there’s a whole other layer to this story that may explain why Nancy Lanza, an elementary school teacher, bought an assault weapon. Maybe it involves her divorce, her ex; maybe it’s something else altogether. But as an ex-teacher, an ex-prison librarian, and a novelist who has written about the dark side of human nature, I smell something really rotten here. It’s the stink of family dynamics that have been spoiled and festering way too long.
The bodies of the young children are still in the school, where they fell, while authorities work to establish positive identities. Throughout the day, parents waited in a nearby firehouse for news about their children, to be reunited with them. At one point the governor told these parents: “If you haven’t been reunited with your children by now, there will not be any reunion.”
I can’t imagine being one of the parents who had not yet been reunited with their child.
Interestingly, the NRA has been silent on this. No tweets, no public statements. Yet, when Rob and I heard the story today, he went on their website and read their usual pap: More guns means greater safety, or something to that effect.
Twitter users are expressing their anger at the NRA:
I’m calling my family to make sure my 6yr old niece in CT is safe.
Are you purchasing a firearm for someone this holiday season?
So the shooter in Connecticut must have been defending himself, right NRA? Keep up the good work!
Well, you won, NRA. Come on forward and claim your prize.
How many of your agents do you have visiting the families of gun violence victims to explain why firearms proliferation is a priority?
You get the idea here. Most of us recognize that the world has changed since 1791. As one tweeter said: The 2nd amendment was written by people who owned muskets and slaves. May be time for an update.
As a country, can’t we do better than this? I mean, really. Little kids. Mowed down at school. Is that the new American story?
UPDATE
As ore information comes out about the Lanza family, we learned today that Nancy Lanza, the mother, was an avid gun collector and often took her sons to a local shooting range. Also, she didn’t teach at the school, so the whole scenario the psychcologist from MSNBC piece together is wrong.








At any rate, the engine was shot and we got the car towed to our local garage. Once I learned that insurance would pay for a new engine, I finally got to that little AT&T store just as they were closing. “Oh, I’m so sorry,” the young man said. “Can you come back tomorrow?”








