The Assault on Women’s Health

Posted on February 24, 2012 by Trish and Rob

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0dKsIvJZ4vc

Imagine it. You’re a woman, single or not, who has made the difficult decision to have an abortion.  But before you can have the procedure, you are mandated to have a transvaginal ultrasound, where a probe, a wand,  is inserted into your vagina. According to Medline Plus, “this probe sends out sound waves which reflect off body structures. A computer receives these waves and uses them to create a picture. The doctor can immediately see the picture on a nearby TV monitor.”

The point of such an unnecessary procedure, of course, is to get the woman who wants the abortion to look at the ultrasound image and change her mind about the abortion. It’s one more weapon in the right-wing arsenal to overturn Roe V Wade. In Florida, in fact, if you refuse to look at the ultrasound image, it will be noted in your medical records. So, let’s say fifteen years later you’re in the midst of a bitter divorce and custody battle and your spouse’s attorney requests that your medical records be submitted as evidence that you’re an unfit parent. She wouldn’t even look at the ultrasound image.

The most recent battleground over this issue was Virginia. According to the Washington Post:  “In Virginia, the bill began muscling its way through a legislature that recently came under the rule of GOP conservatives. It moved ahead despite an outcry from women and Democrats, including a female lawmaker who called it ‘state-mandated rape’ and another who made her point with a failed amendment requiring rectal prostate exams for men seeking Viagra prescriptions.”

Nearly 1,500 women silently protested this bill in Virginia’s capitol and presented Governor Bob McDonnell with petitions that had than 30,000 names  protesting the bill. Then the bill was lampooned on Saturday Night Live and uh-oh, suddenly the popular culture was informed. And apparently the Republican  politicians realized they were on the wrong side of this bill. The governor backed down. Maybe it finally dawned on him that the majority of voters are women.

The Guttmacher Institute, which researches abortion-related issues, is keeping close tabs on this issue. Here’s how they break down the ultrasound laws around the U.S.:

Existing laws: Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas

Enjoined laws (not currently in effect): North Carolina, Oklahoma

Bills pending that require ultrasounds: Alabama, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia

Bills pending that require doctors to offer ultrasounds: Iowa, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey

Even in conservative Mississippi, a bill that would have banned most forms of contraception, was dropped.

This assault on women’s health and choices is appalling and horrifying. We live in the 21st century and Roe V Wade has been federal law since  1973. And what’s with the attempts to ban birth control?

As Rob has said repeatedly, to a Republican, you’re a person only until you’re born. After that, sorry, you’re on your own. You can’t have health insurance, we’re going to take away your public education, we’re going to make life so hard for you that you’re going to wish you were just a fetus again.

Is this the reality we desire for democracy??

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in politics, synchronicity | 10 Comments

More 11s!!

Posted on February 23, 2012 by Trish and Rob

We never tire of synchros involving 11, 111, or 1111. This cluster of 11s comes from Vicki Watt, whose blog is here.  It does seem as if some of us are shadowed by these numbers. In the tarot, card 11 is Justice. In the I Ching, hexagram 11 is Peace. Perhaps there are hints in these two divination systems about Vicki’s synchro clusters involving 11s.

++

I saw your 11 post earlier in the week and wondered what you make of this – my own week has been full of 11s, or 111s.

All this week, my partner and I have been watching Lord of The Rings.  I noted that Bilbo’s Birthday Party was for his 111’th birthday.

Yesterday,  I realized that the Valentines post on the blog I was working on was my 111’th post.

Later in the day, I was working on my partner’s music blog and glanced at his Facebook ‘Like’ box.  He has 111 likes.

Today, I realized on my walk along the coast to a neighboring fishing village, that it’s the 11th of February 2012.

If you break down 11 02 2012 into 1s, you get  111 111 111  (Also, this total’s 9 – my numerology birth number)

Later, as I detoured from my usual route, I walked up through an old lane in the village and glanced at an old door, the number on it was 11.

Also, a few days ago, I saw the book Chocolat at a friend’s house and asked if I could borrow.  I briefly glanced at it and noticed that each chapter began with a date in February.  I thought that was cool because this is February – and it’s also my birth month.

However, I’d completely forgotten about this detail today, as picked up where I left off, a couple of pages into Chapter 1.

As I finished the first chapter, I realised that Chapter 2 begins ’12 February’.  So,  I looked back to see which date was given to Chapter 1.  11th February – today!

Posted in 11, synchronicity | 17 Comments

More Science and Synchronicity

Posted on February 22, 2012 by Trish and Rob


We’ve written about this topic before, usually somewhat disparagingly, since synchronicity hasn’t favored well in the world of traditional science.

Now comes a paper called Synchronicity Studies, by Bernard D. Beitman, MD, a visiting professor of psychiatry at the University of Virginia. Beitman, you might recall, is the author a series of studies of synchronicity that were published in the December 2011 issue of Psychiatric Annals, and reviewed here. The paper accompanied those studies, and Dr. Beitman has asked us to read and comment on it. He would also like to receive comments from others.

Beitman makes three interesting points near the beginning of the paper. He notes that one out of three people notice coincidences taking place in their lives. He adds that reports of coincidental events seem to be increasing. His third point: “Many people, especially people with scientific training, dismiss coincidences as simply a matter of chance: accidents or anomalies generated by randomness.”

He goes on to say that such a dismissal without a review of evidence is hardly scientific and he calls for the establishment of a new transdisciplinary field called Coincidence Studies. He describes three types of coincidence: synchronicity, serendipity, and seriality. Just as Carl Jung coined the term synchronicity to describe meaningful coincidence, Beitman has coined a term, “simulpathity,” which  incorporates empathy with coincidence. We’ve written about planetary empaths – people who feel earthquakes and other disasters as they happen or shortly before they happen – and their experiences might be an example of simulpathity.

Beitman discusses the environments in which synchronicity occurs and this part of his paper bears a striking resemblance to what we wrote about in 7 Secrets:  that synchronicity occurs  frequently during times of major transitions in our lives. He also mentions a personal experience that may have led him into Jungian territory: a choking episode that coincided with what was happening to his father as he choked to death.

Beitman refers to ‘coincidence-prone’ people, an interesting concept. He says such people tend to be self-referential, intuitive, emotional, optimistic, and meaning-seeking. We have  quite a few coincidence-prone folks visiting this blog. Creative people experience synchronicities frequently because synchronicity is part of the creative process.

There’s much more. It’s a long article. If you want to get analytical about synchronicity, this article won’t let you down. Here’s an example:

“The resolution of conflicts among coincidence theories could take three forms. One possibility is that a superordinate theory will encompass all others, explaining all instances of weird coincidence. A second possibility is that different theories may account for different types of coincidences. A third possibility is that each theory explains one aspect of a meaningful coincidence.”

From the academic perspective, there’s a need for theory to explain meaningful coincidences, and justify the concept of coincidence studies. Beitman should be congratulated for his efforts. After all, most academics consider people who take such co-incidents seriously to be dabbling in magical thinking, a term related to superstitious beliefs or behavior. Probably the only subject currently more tarnished than coincidence in the academic realm is the study of UFOs.

Beitman also talks about the idea of being able to predict a coincidence. That sounds suspiciously like applying cause and effect to a phenomenon that essentially is a window to an underlying reality that exists outside of cause and effect, outside of linear time and three-dimensional space. The bottom line is that it would probably take a synchronicity to predict a coincidence!

All of that said, coincidence studies could serve as an important vehicle for studying synchronicity in all its myriad forms. We would like to see how such a study would illuminate the experiences of planetary empaths.  Perhaps such a study could somehow make use of their   often painful experiences , save lives, and help empaths to focus their abilities in a way  that can predict the  location of catastrophic events.

Beitman is curious about how to energize  people who are helped in some way by  coincidence  so that a  tipping point can be reached to bring synchronicity into  major public awareness and academic study. Specifically, here are his points/questions:

1) How can we gain enough energy to reach the tipping point into public and academic awareness?

2) What parts of the Coincidence Studies paper do you resonate with and what seems to need developing and what seems wrong?

3) The Coincidence Studies paper is a Manifesto–it outlines the future of a new field. What is needed to help this new field grow and flourish?

4) How can you help?

There’s a second paper that was published in EdgeScience Magazine which you can download for free. Click the link above, then the PDF link for issue 9. This article is much longer and talks about involving “citizen scientists” in the research of synchronicity.

So here we are, people from all walks of life, different ethnic and cultural backgrounds, and spiritual beliefs who experience synchronicity frequently, learn from it, are illuminated by it. How can we help in the scientific/academic exploration of this  phenomenon? How can science expand our understanding?

 

Posted in science synchronicity, synchronicity | 34 Comments

They’re watching…or are they?

Posted on February 21, 2012 by Trish and Rob

After our first night in our ‘urban chic’ studio apartment in downtown Toronto, we were ready for a leisurely breakfast. Trish had gone over her notes about Wolfgang Pauli and the Pauli effect at least a hundred times it seemed and she was ready for the interview.

The actual topic was an unusual story of a human rights lawyer named Cheryl Welch, who is convinced that the U.S. government is not only spying on her, but has targeted her in a wide-ranging mind control experiment. Trish was to provide one of several alternate explanations.

So as we left the room for breakfast on the interview day, I found a newspaper hanging on our door. It was the weekend issue the National Post, which appears to be a cross between the New York Post with its huge front page headlines and the dour, conservative perspective of the Wall Street Journal.

What caught my attention, of course, was the top-half of the front page, pictured above. Those scowling eyes and the headline: They’re Watching  – What does the government already know about you?

I showed it to Trish and said: “Mind control?” It seemed that the newspaper had pre-empted Weird or What? with their own story of supposed government intrusion.

Such experiments definitely took place in the 1950s and ’60s in an experiment called MK-ULTRA, a code name for  illegal and covert experiments run by the CIA’s Office of Scientific Intelligence. Targets were subjected unknowingly to hallucinogenic drugs and a variety of mind control techniques including  hypnosis, sensory deprivation, isolation, verbal and sexual abuse, as well as various forms of torture.

In the mid-1980s, I was approached by a medical doctor who said he had a patient who believed the government was beaming microwaves and other energy fields at her. It was affecting her health and mental stability, he said. I was working as a journalist and something I’d written prompted him to contact me.

When I met the woman, she lived in a spotless, but impersonal environment, a condo in South Florida high above the Atlantic. She said she could hear voices seemingly broadcast from her teeth. Interestingly, Cheryl Welch mentions the same phenomenon happening to her. I eventually wrote an article about the woman’s experience. It was a peculiar piece because I introduced the woman to a former police officer who had left law enforcement to become a psychic working as a consultant with police departments. He felt the woman was telling the truth, as she perceived it, but he was unable to pick up any energy fields or the source of such fields. So, as with many such cases, this one was difficult to verify.

So are these covert experiments still taking place and is Cheryl a target? William Shatner’s Weird or What? set out to find out and included three alternate explanations. The Pauli effect was one and we were contacted to explain it. Trish initially wanted me to be the interviewee since I’d done a couple of TV shows related the Bermuda Triangle. But it was her turn and she grudgingly agreed to sit before the camera.

Cheryl Welch believes that the government is not only affecting her, but others around her. If she goes outside in a crowd, she says people will shout obscenities and spit at her. Supposedly, these people are either plants or innocent bystanders temporarily subjected to the same mental manipulations.

As an alternative explanation, Trish proposed that Cheryl might have some telekinetic abilities,  similar to the Pauli effect, which would explain some of the strange things happening around her. She also suggested that Cheryl might be experiencing ‘like attracts like’ or the law of attraction. In other words, she is so convinced that she is a victim of mind control that she attracts related experiences.

Oddly enough, it’s a case where the psychic explanation just might be more reasonable than the one based on cause and effect, ie. government mind control.

I briefly wondered if the newspaper on our hotel door could have been created for us and planted by a government agent as a means of intimidating us before the interview on the related subject. That would fit with Cheryl’s scenario.

In our experience, stuff like that is more likely to emerge from the underlying world that exists outside of cause and effect, space and linear time, the realm to which synchronicity serves as a doorway–the unconscious or the collective unconscious.

Certainly, government agents do silly wasteful things, but that newspaper was not one of them. We saw other copies of that newspaper around, including one on the airplane during the return flight.  For us, it was a case of synchronicity, one of many that we experienced in Toronto.

Posted in Pauli, pauli effect, synchronicity, Toronto | 11 Comments

137, Pauli, and Toronto

Posted on February 20, 2012 by Trish and Rob

Over the weekend, we went to Toronto to be interviewed for William Shatner’s show,   Weird or What?  We were supposed to talk about Wolfgang Pauli, the theoretical physicist who won a Nobel in 1945  for his exclusion principle and also collaborated with Carl Jung on synchronicity. Specifically, we were there to talk about the Pauli effect –  i.e., the spontaneous breakdown of laboratory equipment in his presence. And this seemingly psychokinetic effect was to be presented as a possible theory for what’s happening to a woman who believes she’s the victim of government mind control.

Pauli was also known for his connection with the number 137,  one of the unsolved mysteries of modern physics, the value of the fine structure constant , the DNA of light, as author Arthur I Miller put it in his book, Deciphering the Cosmic Number: the Strange Friendship of Wolfgang Pauli and Carl Jung. 137 is a prime number – a number that can be divided by 1 and by itself. Or, put another way, a prime number is a positive integer that cannot equal the product of two smaller integers.

The number became so puzzling to physicists that the famed Richard Feynman, who won the Nobel Prize in 1965 for his contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics, said that physicists should put a sign in their offices to remind themselves of how much they don’t know. The sign would be simple: 137.

This number confounded Pauli for much of his adult life. When at the age of 58, he entered the hospital for routine surgery and discovered he would be in room 137, he reportedly told a friend: “I won’t get out of here alive.” And he didn’t. He died before he could be released.

Now here’s the synchro. We were picked up at the airport on Friday evening  by a service Shatner’s production company provided. The car was spacious, comfortable, and gave us a chance to sit back and take in the city as the driver made his way through Friday rush hour traffic. At one point, the line of cars came to a complete standstill and  I glanced up from whatever I was doing and couldn’t believe what I was seeing.

There, on my right, was a building with prominent white numbers on the front: 137, Pauli’s number. And we were here to talk about Pauli.

I quickly nudged Rob and we both laughed.  Then I noticed that the building was a gym – Good Life Fitness – which struck me as strangely ironic. 137 had proven to be Pauli’s death number, but we were here to talk about one facet of his life.

Something similar and more dramatic happened to physicist F. David Peat when he was invited to speak at the 50th anniversary of the opening of Jung’s institute in Zurich.  But in both instances the message was the same: we, like Peat, were to talk about Pauli when the number appeared.

The synchro, though, continued. On Sunday, we had some time before we were to be picked up at our hotel, so we walked around downtown and found ourselves on Yonge Street, where the gym was located. I wanted to get a picture of the 137, so we walked until we found it and I took the photo at the top of the post. We continued our walk and after a few blocks one of us mentioned Pauli again. At that moment, we both noticed a prominent sign across the street: WE’VE MOVED to 137 YONGE. It was apparently the former site of the gym.

When we  returned to the hotel, we sat in the lobby and I started emailing the photos on my Blackberry to myself so I could  download them to my computer.  I emailed the 137 picture to a couple of friends whom I knew would enjoy it and as I checked my iPad to make sure the photos were going through, I suddenly noticed that the 137 photo had been emailed at 1:37. I snapped this photo of my iPad:

Pauli greeted us hello as we entered the city and waved good-bye as we were waiting to leave.

 

Posted in 137, Pauli, pauli effect, synchronicity | 44 Comments

Synchronicity on film

Posted on February 18, 2012 by Trish and Rob

Well worth the eight and a half minutes. Enjoy!

 

Posted in synchronicity | 13 Comments

The Mayan Calendar

Posted on February 17, 2012 by Trish and Rob

Thanks to Adele for sending us this cartoon.

Posted in synchronicity | 5 Comments

Face in the Clouds

Posted on February 16, 2012 by Trish and Rob

 

We first saw this story on Brizdaz’s blog, Just Watching the Wheels Go Round.  It’s one of those anomalous synchronicities that suggests spirit communication. Adele enhanced the lighting with Photoshop, which really shows the image much more clearly!

++

On January 9, at precisely the time that Gerry Wells, 62, was flying from Brisbane to Sydney, Australia, this photo of an unusual cloud formation was taken by Russell Eldridge, the former editor of Northern Star, an Australian newspaper. Eldridge sent it to the newspaper and they were impressed enough to publish it.

On January 24, the day after Gerry returned from his two weeks in Sydney, where he visited family and friends, he died suddenly of a heart attack. A friend saw the photo in the newspaper and was struck by the eerie similarity between the cloud formation and Gerry’s face. He sent the photo to Gerry’s son, Dean, who emailed it to family members.

Gerry’s sister, Marion Dawson, says that when she saw it, she got goosebumps. “It’s so like my brother, and was taken just at the time when he was making what turned out to be his last journey to visit the people he loved in Sydney. It brought tears to our eyes.”

At Gerry’s funeral, the family handed out leaflets with the photo on it. “Thinking of all the people he went to spend time with in Sydney, it was like he was going to say good-bye to them all,” Marion says.

+++

In Synchronicity and the Other Side, there’s a chapter called Objects of Interests, where we talk about how spirits use objects in various ways to communicate with us. From mirrors to feathers, books to televisions and radios, movies, lights, and food, virtually any object in the physical world – even clouds! – can be used by a spirit to communicate with us.

 

Posted in daz, spirt communication, synchronicity | 12 Comments

The 3 Jacquelines

Posted on February 15, 2012 by Trish and Rob

Adele Aldridge, who has one of the best I Ching sites, sent us this interesting cluster synchro involving a name – Jacqueline. In 7 Secrets, we have a chapter on cluster synchros – they’re  always fascinating, though their message isn’t necessarily obvious.

++

I know 3 people with the name of Jacqueline who are connected in my life now in some way. They do not know each other.

Jacqueline #1 is my sister and lives in Manhattan.

Jacqueline #2 is my friend for 35 years and lives in San Francisco.

Jacqueline #3 is a neighbor/friend/acquaintance.

I haven’t seen any of these Jacqueline’s in times ranging from 4 months to 15 years.

Jacqueline #3 called me this afternoon and asked me if I would come over and have a drink. I haven’t heard from her in months. She just came back from the funeral of her brother and then a week with her daughter and now home and wanted company. This kind of request has never happened with her before. So I walked over and had some wine and a long talk as we always do when we meet, which is to bemoan the fact that we have to live in New Jersey and how we miss California.

I stayed about an hour. After I sat down at my computer to check my email, two messages came in simultaneously at 5:56 p.m.  One message was from Jacqueline # 1 from Manhattan, my sister.

And message # 2 arrived at the exact moment of message #1 from Jacqueline # 2, my friend in San Francisco.

It was not only surprising to hear from all 3 Jacqueline’s on the same day within minutes of each other but the two Jacqueline’s on the different coasts hitting here at the simultaneous moment was something I have never seen before – same name or not.

What do you make of this?

All I can think of is that it is full moon in Leo today conjunct my Sun.

+++

Since Adele sent us this synchro about the 3 Jacquies, two more have surfaced. So now she has a cluster of FIVE Jacquies.

Anyone have any ideas what this cluster might mean? And what’s with that time? 5:56=7. We need Math to figure out the numbers!

 

 

Posted in clusters, synchronicity | 20 Comments

Peanuts

Posted on February 14, 2012 by Trish and Rob

 

Twelve years ago today, Charles Schulz, the creator of the comic strip Peanuts, died at the age of 77, from colon cancer. This may seem like a strange post for Valentine’s Day, but there’re a couple of synchros here that are heart felt.

Schulz drew Peanuts for nearly half a century. That’s a very long time to spend with characters you created, to be involved with their lives, their issues, their relationships. The comic strip was read by 355 million people worldwide, reached readers in 75 countries, in 2,600 newspapers, and 21 languages.  The strip, merchandise, and product endorsements brought in $1.1  billion a year. Schulz is said to have earned between $30 million and $40 million a year, doing what he loved. In nearly 50 years, Schultz drew ore than 18,250 comic strips.

“That’s longer than any epic poem,  any Tolstoy novel, any Wagner opera,” said Robert Thompson, a professor of popular culture at Syracuse University.  Just hours before the last Sunday episode in the saga of Charlie Brown, Lucy, Snoopy, and Linus ran in the Sunday papers, Schultz passed away.

His wife, Jeannie, said, “He had done everything he wanted.”

Lynn Johnston, a friend of Schuz’s and the creator of a strip called For Better or Worse, told the AP: “It’s amazing that he dies just before his last strip is published…It was as if he’d written it that way.”

While Schulz was in the hospital, Johnston recalled a remark he had made:  You control all these characters and the lives they live. You decide when they get up in the morning, when they’re going to fight with their friends, when they’re going to lose the game. Isn’t it amazing how you have no control over your real life? But, as Johnston said, ”I think, in a way, he did.”

When I was a kid growing up in Venezuela, I remember that every Sunday morning, my dad would turn first to the comic section in the American newspaper, The Daily Journal, or to the Venezuelan paper, and read Peanuts. He would chuckle or laugh out loud and one Sunday I finally asked what the deal was with this comic strip. He thought a moment, then said: “These characters, in any language, are us, we humans.”

Peanuts became a part of our collective consciousness. His creation wasn’t just confined to the comic section of newspapers. There were books, TV specials, commercials, a rock song, a concerto at Carnegie Hall, his work was even shown at the Louvre. The novelist Umberto Eco wrote the introduction to the first Peanuts book translated into Italian.  According to the NY Times, Eco referred to the book as ‘poesie interrompue, or interrupted poetry, “and, using Freud, Beckett, Adler and Thomas Mann to back him up, said, ‘These children affect us because in a certain sense they are monsters; they are the monstrous infantile reductions of all the neuroses of a modern citizen of the industrial civilization.’”

I don’t agree with the monstrous part. But one thing is for sure: Schultz followed his passions, he did what he loved.  As the Times article put it, “Snoopy could always be counted on to nap, fantasize and wonder when his next meal would arrive. Charlie Brown, the round-headed blockhead (named after one of Mr. Schulz’s childhood friends, not after the cartoonist himself), could always be counted on to persevere despite constant failure. He once held onto the string of a kite that was stuck in a tree for eight days running, until the rain made him stop. At the time it was the longest run of immobility for any cartoon character. His first home run came after nearly 43 years of strike outs, on March 30, 1993.”

Really? I mean, who couldn’t love these characters?

So it’s strangely fitting that Charles Schulz passed away on Valentine’s Day. The day before he died, he said, Charlie Brown, Snoopy, Linus, Lucy . . . how can I ever forget them?

If that isn’t love, what is?

 

Posted in synchronicity | 22 Comments