Carl Jung wrote the introduction to the Richard Wilhelm edition of the I Ching in 1949. It was where he first addressed the concept of synchronicity. The hexagram, the basis of the I Ching, is – according to Jung – “the exponent of the moment in which it was cast…an indicator of the essential situation prevailing in the moment of origin. This assumption involves a curious principle that I have termed synchronicity.”
The premise is simple: you toss 6 coins 6 times, and depending on how they fall, you either end up with a single hexagram or, if you have changing lines, with two hexagrams. The second one is how the situation evolves. But while the process is simple, penetrating ancient Chinese thought is not.
I’ve been using the I Ching since I was 18 (way too many years ago). You would think that when I toss the coins and a particular hexagram comes up, I would take it as the answer. But recently, I tossed hexagram 33, about a possible business deal. Hexagram 33 is Retreat. In other words, I should have backpedaled quickly. I didn’t. I decided I didn’t like that hexagram, that it couldn’t possibly be true, so I tossed it again. Big mistake. All the reason I should have retreated ended with the disruption of a friendship. So tonight while we were watching the news, I decided to ask the I Ching about the situation in the gulf, on day 79. My question: Is the gusher going to turn the gulf into a dead zone?
My first hexagram was, well, #33, Retreat. A certain sychro there, for sure. I had three changing lines – the 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place. The evolving hexagram was #59, Dispersion. So let’s look at the changing lines. In the interest of space, I won’t quote everything. The changing line in the 2nd place, summed up, says: “While the superior men retreat and the inferior press after them,the interior man represented here holds on so firmly and tightly to the superior men that the latter cannot shake him off.” If BP is the inferior man, and perhaps the people of the gulf are the superior men, this doesn’t sound good.
3rd line: This one seems to be addressing why the government continues to allow BP to be in charge of this mess: “When it is time to retreat it is both unpleasant and dangerous to be held back. In such a case, the only expedient is to take into one’s service, so to speak, those who refuse to let one go. But even with this expedient the situation is far from satisfactory – for what can one hope to accomplish with such servants?”.
4th line: I’m not sure what this line is addressing: “Voluntary retreat brings good fortune to the superior man and downfall to the inferior man.”
This brings us to the second hexagram, which addresses how the situation evolves: #59, Dispersion. Since dispersants are being used in the gulf, this one feels like it’s on target. “Through hardness and selfishness the heart grows rigid, and this rigidity leads to separation from all others. Therefore the hearts of men must be seized by a devout emotion.”
Perhaps this hexagram addresses the power of a collective emotion – rage, outrage, horror – to break the hold of the inferior man. When I initially turned to Hexagram 59, the first words I read were: “Wind blowing over water disperses it…” And I immediately thought of a hurricane. So, is it going to take a hurricane dispersing oil and toxic chemicals across the gulf states and the eastern seaboard to break BP’s hold on this situation?
The two hexagrams don’t seem to answer my question about whether the gulf will become a dead zone, but they do appear to address the situation. Any I Ching masters out there who can illuminate this issue for the rest of us?
A tiny PS to this story. As I went to schedule it on the dashboard, I noticed I had started it at 9:11.