Logo of Reporters Without Borders in defense of online free expression.
.
A few weeks ago, we received a notice from blogger that one of our posts had been cited for copyright infringement, so our blog was taken down, the supposedly offensive post was put into draft form, and we were told that unless the offensive post was removed, our blog would be deleted. We deleted the post, but were totally mystified about how we had infringed on copyright.
As professional writers, copyright infringement is important to us. The story, from last November, was a seemingly innocuous post of two or three sentences about two of the deaths in the construction of the Hoover Dam, a father and son, the first and the last to die. We provided links to our sources and, the story is detailed in Wikipedia. On December 20, 1922, J.G. Tierney died while surveying for a site for the dam and thirteen years later to the day, his son, Patrick Tierney, was the last man to die during the dam’s construction.There you have it.
In the aftermath of the removal of the offending post, we noticed that someone from the Department of the Interior, which is in charge of sites like dams, had been on our blog a number of times, always searching for Hoover Dam. So we wrote to the Interior Department and asked if a copyright infringement complaint had been made by the department. We included blogger’s email to us and a screenshot of sitemeter showing the search words and the Interior Department’s name. We received a wonderful email from their public affairs specialist, who said she would look into. Quoting from her email:
Hi there, Rob!
I’m not sure who would be asking you to remove these facts since, as you mentioned, they’re well documented in a number of other sources, several of which we use here in our office as research resources. We even have this information listed on our own official Bureau of Reclamation Hoover Dam website at: https://www.usbr.gov/lc/hooverdam/History/essays/fatal.html , so I’m really not sure why Google or anyone associated with the Department would be making this request.
Do you have a copy of the request and/or a name as to who initiated this? I’d be happy to follow up with them to determine why this is being considered. Just let me know if there’s any way I can help. Thanks!
Colleen Dwyer, Public Affairs Specialist
Bureau of Reclamation, Boulder City, Nevada
Her followup was extensive. She checked with the Interior Department’s regional security staff and with the Hoover Dam Police Department “just in case they conduct some random security on the web to find any potential info that may impact security of Hoover Dam, but they do not conduct these kinds of actions.”
She went on to say:
“Frankly, I’m surprised that Google would ask for removal of a post based solely on one individual’s comment, and without specific proof of the copyright violation. I’m not sure of the procedure to contest the infringement claim, but if you can use my e-mails and/or contact information as proof of clearance by the Bureau of Reclamation for you to publish the information regarding the Tierneys, feel free to do so.”
On July 7, someone came onto the blog using the search term, “Hoover Dam crack image download.” They didn’t find anything on our blog because the post had been removed, and besides, we hadn’t written about any crack. It’s an amusing synchro, however, since we certainly found a crack in the dam with our experience writing about it.
So we have clearance from the Interior Department, which uses the same story in their materials. We haven’t copied anyone else’s material. The info in Wikipedia is still there. Who knows?

















